Architectural building of the 18th century. Architecture of the 18th century in Russia. Palace ensemble in Bogoroditsk

1. Architecture XVII century

   Abstract >> Construction

   « Architecture XVII century"XVII century appeared century shocks and huge changes in Russia. This century turmoil, ... the life-affirming character of the rapidly developing Russian national art XVII c.Proper Russian architecture XVII V. desire for pomp...

2. Russian culture 18 century

   Abstract >> Culture and art

   Future revolution. Chapter 3. Architecture. The dynamics of stylistic development are also growing in a peculiar way. Russian architecture XVIII century. In the country, belatedly... and colorful embroideries. Throughout XVIII century Russian the art of painting has come a long way...

3. Russian portrait XVIII century

   Abstract >> Culture and art

   Expressions. And in architecture, and in sculpture, and in painting, and in graphics Russian art reached pan-European... XVIII century there was no sculptural portrait. Peculiarities Russian portrait of the middle XVIII century From the middle XVII in the middle XVIII century ...

4. Russian culture XVII century

   Abstract >> Culture and art

   Short review Russian history from ancient times to the 70s. XVII century, - “Synopsis” of Innocent... - Karion Istomin, Sylvester Medvedev. Architecture. In development architecture XVII V. Three stages can be distinguished: 1) first...

5. Plan:

   1. Introduction
   2.) Main part.
   I.) Architecture of the first half of the 18th century: Baroque
   II.) Baroque architecture of the mid-18th century
   III.) Prerequisites for the emergence and development of classicism
   IV.) Architecture of early classicism (1760-1780)
   V.) Architecture of strict classicism (1780-1800)
   3.) Conclusion
   4.) List of used literature

   1. Introduction.
   For many centuries of Russian history, wood remained the main material in the construction of buildings and structures. It was in wooden architecture that many construction and compositional techniques were developed that met the natural and climatic conditions and artistic tastes of the people, which later influenced the formation of stone architecture.
   Frequent fires accelerated the replacement of wood with stone in important urban structures such as city walls, towers and temples. The wooden walls of the Novgorod brainchild with an earthen rampart and ditch are mentioned around 1044, and the first information about a stone fence dates back to 1302. The first information about the stone fence of Kyiv dates back to 1037, Staraya Ladoga - 1116, Moscow - 1367. Despite some differences in architecture in certain parts of Rus', it had a number of common features, determined by the same conditions of development. This allows us to talk about Russian architecture in general and its artistic manifestation in different regions of the country throughout the history of the people.
   Architecture is a phenomenon derived from a specific functional need, depending both on construction and technical capabilities (building materials and structures), and on aesthetic ideas, determined by the artistic views and tastes of the people, their creative ideas.
   When perceiving works of Russian architecture, regardless of the time of their construction and size, the proportionality of the relationship between man and building is clearly visible. A peasant hut, a city residential building, a church or other building - they are all on a human scale, which gives Russian architecture a humanistic character.

   2.) Main part.
   I.) Architecture of the first half of the 18th century: Baroque.
   The seventeenth century marks the end of the 700-year period of ancient Russian stone construction, which has written more than one remarkable page in the chronicle of world architecture. The sprouts of new monetary and trade relations and a rational worldview are breaking through the ossified forms of Domostroevsky life and scholastic* dogmas of theology. The sound views of the serving nobility and the economically prosperous merchants affect many aspects of public life and its material shell - architecture. Trade expanded, especially at the end of the 17th century, with Germany, Flanders, and England. Cultural ties with Poland and Holland are becoming closer. The broadening of horizons and the penetration of elements of Western European artistic culture into art and architecture was facilitated by the joint creative work of Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian craftsmen. The historical unity of three fraternal peoples, largely based on common architectural trends, mutually enriched their skills. Life urgently demanded the construction of guest courtyards, administrative buildings, industrial enterprises, posed new practical problems, and obliged architects to look for technical and artistic solutions. The centralization of state power was accompanied by regulation in the field of construction. Architectural and technical documentation is being normalized. Design and reporting materials are being improved, large-scale drawings are being mastered, and architectural and construction details are being unified.
   The end of the 17th century is a connecting link between ancient Russian architecture and the architecture of the 17th century, a time that prepared the ground for a new artistic worldview, promoting the creative perception of the order tectonic system and the formation of masters of architecture for the transition to regular civil construction.
   At the beginning of the 17th century, St. Petersburg became the main construction center. In 1700, Russia began the Northern War against Sweden to liberate Russian lands and return the Neva banks to Russia. On May 1, 1703, Russian troops entered the Nyenschanz fortress (at the confluence of the Okhta and Neva rivers). the main task The northern war was decided by the capture of the fortress. Access to the Baltic Sea was open for Russia. It was only necessary to secure it and secure it. At the branching of the Neva into three branches, on a small Hare Island approximately 750 by 350 meters long and wide, on May 27, 1703, according to the drawings of Peter I and military engineers, a fortress of a new bastion type was founded - the Peter and Paul Fortress. To cover the mouth of the Neva from the sea, in 1703, construction of the naval base Kronshlot (Kronstadt) began on Kotlin Island. On the southern bank of the Neva, almost opposite Peter and Paul Fortress, in 1704, according to the drawings of Peter I, a shipbuilding shipyard-fortress was laid - the Admiralty. Under the protection of three interacting fortresses, the construction of St. Petersburg began, which in 1712 became the new capital of Russia, proclaimed an empire in 1721.
   __________
   *Scholasticism (from the Greek scholastikos - school, scientist), a type of religious philosophy characterized by a combination of theological-dogmatic premises with rationalistic methodology and interest in formal-logical problems.

   State and cultural transformations during the Peter the Great period brought to life industrial and public buildings and structures - fortifications, shipyards, factories, industrial and hospitality yards, colleges, hospitals, educational and museum premises, theaters and residential buildings. The development of St. Petersburg was carried out mainly along the banks of the Neva, its branches and channels, due to the severe swampiness of the soil and access to waterways.
   The placement of city-forming structures was carried out according to the instructions of Peter I himself. Initially, settlements were grouped according to tradition into settlements. They were built in the form of peasant huts or city mansions with facades, sometimes
   painted to resemble brickwork. The only example of the early period is the later recreated log house of Peter I on the banks of the Neva on the Petrograd side, painted on the outside to look like brick.
   Since 1710, only brick houses began to be built. Despite forced resettlement measures in St. Petersburg, construction proceeded slowly. The ideological and political importance of the rapid construction of the capital put forward important tasks for architecture. The city had to be created based on advanced urban planning principles, ensuring its prestigious and representative character not only in its external architectural and artistic appearance, but also in its planning structure. There was a shortage of qualified architects. And in 1709, the Chancellery was established, which was in charge of all construction matters. A school for the initial study of architecture was created under it. It was hoped that the students of this school would gain deeper knowledge in architectural teams in the process of practical cooperation between experienced architects. However, the school and teams could not support the expanding capital construction. Peter I invited experienced architects from Western countries, which made it possible to almost immediately involve them in the construction of the city. They also select talented young people and send them to study engineering and architectural arts in Western European countries.
   The following were invited to the new capital in 1710: Italians N. Michetti, G. Chiaveri, C. B. Rastrelli, Frenchman J. B. Leblon, Germans G. Matornovi, I. Schendel, A. Schlüter, Dutchman G. Van Boles. They had to not only build, but also train Russian architects from the students who worked with them. Italians came from Moscow - M. Fontana and fortification engineer and architect Domenico Trezzini. Gifted Russian architects I.P.Zarudny, D.V.Aksamitov, P.Potapov, M.I.Chochlakov, Ya.G.Bukhvostov, G.Ustinov and others successfully worked in Moscow. At the same time, the art of architecture was comprehended by those sent abroad who later became major architects: Ivan Korobov, Mordvinov and Ivan Michurin, Pyotr Eropkin, Timofey Usov and others. Thus, architects of different national schools worked in the new capital, but they created differently than in their homeland, obeying the tastes and requirements of customers, as well as adapting to the specific conditions of the city under construction. As a result of their activities, the architecture of St. Petersburg at that time became a unique fusion of native Russian artistic traditions and formal elements brought from Western European countries.

   Russian, Italian, Dutch, German and French architects erected mansions, palaces, temples and government buildings in the Russian capital, the architecture of which had common artistic features that defined the architectural style, usually called Russian Baroque of the 18th century or Peter's Baroque.
   All the diversity of individual creative views of various architects in practice was softened under the influence of two main factors: firstly, the influence of centuries-old Russian traditions, the carriers and conductors of which were the executors of architectural designs - numerous carpenters, masons, plasterers, molders and other construction craftsmen. Secondly, the role of the customers, and above all Peter I himself, who extremely carefully and demandingly examined all the design proposals of the architects, rejecting those that, from his point of view, did not correspond to the appearance of the capital, or making significant and sometimes decisive changes. Often he himself indicated where, what and how to build, becoming an architect. On his initiative, master plans for St. Petersburg were developed. The artistic commonality of St. Petersburg buildings of Peter the Great's time is also explained by the peculiarities of building materials. Houses in the capital were built of mud-dove type and brick, plastered in two colors (the walls were red, light brown or green, and the blades, pilasters, platbands, and rustications on the corners were white). To attract masons to St. Petersburg, Peter I in 1714 issued a decree prohibiting construction with stone and brick throughout Russia, except the capital. The features of the architectural style can be clearly seen when considering the surviving architectural works of that time, such as "Monplaisir" and "Hermitage" in Petegof, the building of the Kunstkamera and the Twelve Colleges in St. Petersburg, etc.
   At the direction of Peter I, Domenico Trezzini (1670-1734), for the first time in Russian architecture, developed in 1714 exemplary designs for residential buildings intended for developers of different incomes: small one-story ones for the poorest population, larger ones for the nobles. The French architect J.B. Leblon (1679-1719) developed a project for a two-story house “for eminent people.” The model project “resembles a well-preserved summer palace Peter I, which was built by D. Trezzini in 1710-1714 in the summer garden.
   Despite the simplicity of the “exemplary” residential building projects, they are all distinguished by the character of the facades with rhythmically placed openings, framed by platbands of restrained outlines and figured gates on the side. Unlike the medieval development of Russian cities, where residential buildings stood behind fences in the depths of plots, all houses in the capital had to face the red lines* of streets and embankments, forming the front of their development and thereby giving the city an organized appearance. This urban planning innovation is reflected in the development of Moscow. Along with residential buildings In St. Petersburg and its suburbs, palaces with representative facades and vast, richly decorated state rooms were built.
   _____________________
   * Conditional boundary in urban planning, separating the roadway of the street from the building area

   Decorative sculpture began to be used in combination with architecture, and picturesque decoration began to be used in interiors. Country and suburban residences with gardens are being created. The largest public buildings created by D. Trezzini that have survived to this day are the Peter and Paul Cathedral and the building of the Twelve Colleges. From under the arch of the Peter's Gate, the Peter and Paul Cathedral (1712-1733) clearly appears. The dynamic silhouette of the cathedral's bell tower, crowned with a high gilded spire and a weather vane in the form of an angel, rises from behind the walls of the fortress to 122 meters, becoming one of the most expressive dominants in the panorama of the city on the Neva. The cathedral marked a complete departure from the compositional traditionalism of Russian temple construction. The cathedral was an innovative phenomenon for Russia. In its plan and appearance, it is not similar to Orthodox, cross-domed, five-domed or hipped churches. The cathedral is a rectangular building, elongated from west to east. The interior space of the cathedral is divided by powerful pylons* into three almost equal and identical in height (16 meters) spans. This type is called hall, in contrast to churches, in which, with the same plan, the middle span is higher and often wider than the side ones. The layout and silhouette composition of the cathedral were based on the structure of Baltic Lutheran hall-type churches with a bell tower topped with a spire. It was he who was supposed to become a symbol of the establishment of Russia at the mouth of the Neva and a symbol of the creative power of the Russian people. The spire, the prominent end of church bell towers, was a typical phenomenon for Peter's Petersburg, determining the silhouette character of the city's development in the first third of the 18th century. The interior decoration should also be noted - a wooden carved gilded iconostasis in the Baroque style. The iconostasis was made under the direction of the architect and artist I.P. Zarudny (1722-1727) by an artel of Moscow craftsmen.
   On Vasilyevsky Island The political center of the capital was formed and, according to the project of D. Trezzini, a building of twelve colleges was erected (10 colleges - government bodies; the Senate and the Synod). The three-story building, 400 meters long, consists of twelve identical buildings with separate roofs and porticoes, connected at the ends. All buildings are united by an open arcade** with a long corridor on the second floor. According to the tradition of Peter the Great's time, the building was painted in two colors: brick red and white. The original decoration of the interiors in the form of stucco decoration has been preserved only in the Petrovsky Hall. The architectural value of that time should be noted for the palace of A.D. Menshikov (1710-1720). The three-tier order system of the facade with tiered rhythmic rows of pilasters was based on the artistic principles of Italian Renaissance architecture. The most remarkable architectural heritage is the state rooms, lined with Dutch tiles and the main staircase with columns and pilasters of the Baroque order.
   ______________
   *Pylon (from the Greek pylon, lit. - gate, entrance), massive pillars that serve as a support for ceilings or stand on the sides of entrances or driveways.
   **Arcade (French arcade), a series of identical arches supported by columns or pillars.

   The use of orders in the architecture of St. Petersburg was a continuation of the traditions embodied in many buildings in Moscow of an earlier time. The original silhouette of the Kunstkamera building occupies a special place in the panorama of the banks of the Neva. The two wings of the three-story building on the ground floor are united by a four-story tower. The angles of the risalits* and the fractures of the tower walls, combined with the two-tone coloring of the facade, give the building an elegant look. The silhouette of the tower clearly shows the continuity of the traditional stepped multi-tiered buildings of Moscow at the beginning of the 18th century. After the fire, the façade was simplified during restoration.
   In 1710, Peter I issued a decree obliging construction south coast Gulf of Finland. Palace and park ensembles are being built in Peterhof. By 1725, a two-story Nagorny Palace was erected. IN further palace underwent reconstruction and was expanded in the middle of the 18th century. Architect Rastrelli.
   During the same period, a small palace was built near the bay itself, consisting of several rooms for Peter I and a state hall - the Monplaisir Palace. The Hermitage pavilion for privacy and the small two-story Marly palace were built.
   In addition to St. Petersburg, construction was carried out in Moscow and other cities of the Russian Empire. As a result of the fire in Moscow in 1699, it was forbidden to erect wooden buildings in fire areas.
   At the same time, the formal artistic convergence of the architecture of stone buildings in Moscow with Western European architecture, which began at the end of the 17th century, became even more noticeable at the beginning of the 18th century. An example of this is: the palace of F.Ya. Lefort on the Yauza (1697-1699); Old Mint (1697); Church of the Assumption on Pokrovka (1695-1699); Church of the Sign in Dubrovitsy (1690-1704). This indicates that domestic architects knew the order tectonic system and could skillfully combine order and other elements with Russian traditional techniques. An example of such a combination is the Lefortovo Palace in Nemetskaya Sloboda, built by one of the Moscow architects. The facades of the palace are divided by the measured rhythm of pilasters of the great Corinthian order. On the sides of the entrance arch their rhythm changes and they form a pilaster portico with a pediment. The planned system at the same time is a composition of a closed square, adopted in Rus' for trading and other yards.
   In the 18th century, the order system became a common decorative technique for giving various buildings an elegant appearance.
   This is evidenced by the artistic design of the main entrance to the courtyard
   Arsenal (1702-1736) in the Kremlin, which represents a skillful transformation of orders combined with an abundance of decorative relief details. Remarkable in its architecture and artistic significance in Moscow architecture is the Church of the Archangel Gabriel (1701-1707), created by the architect I.P. Zarudny (1670-1727). The architect showed excellent skill in using order systems. The load-bearing part of the church volumes is designed using a large order, which is combined with elegant compositions of porticoes at the entrance made of two light columns
   ________
   *Rizalit (from Italian risalita - protrusion), part of the building protruding beyond the main building. façade line; usually located symmetrically relative to to the central axis of the facade.

   Corinthian order supporting a decoratively designed entablature with a balustrade. The order in the building expresses the tectonics of the exhibition.
   A new direction in the church architecture of Moscow, clearly expressed in the architecture of the Church of the Archangel Gabriel (Menshikov Tower), consisting in a harmonious combination of traditional Russian volumetric-spatial composition with formal elements of the new style, left an interesting example in Moscow - the Church of John the Warrior (1709-1713) on Yakimanka.
   Architects I.A. Mordvinov and I.F. Michurin (1700-1763) were sent from St. Petersburg to Moscow. They were involved in drawing up plans for the Kremlin, Kitai-gorod and partly White City in connection with the move of the royal court to Moscow and the construction of palaces of the court nobility along the banks of the Yauza. Michurin in 1734-1739 drew up a plan for Moscow, which represents a significant urban planning document of Moscow in the 18th century. It depicted the development of the city at that time. Other Russian cities continued to develop. An interesting example of the durability of national architectural traditions in the province is the Peter and Paul Cathedral in Kazan (1726).

   II.) Baroque architecture of the mid-18th century.
   During the period described, V.N. Tatishchev and M.V. Lomonosov laid the foundations of Russian historical science. Russian science and culture are of a high level, not inferior to European ones. Thanks to this, the first university was opened in Russia in 1755, and the Academy of Arts was opened in St. Petersburg, which played a major role in the development of the art and architecture of classicism.
   Russia in the middle of the 18th century became one of the most developed European countries. All this determined the solemn and decorative appearance of palaces and temples - the main types of monumental buildings in Russia during this period. The most outstanding architects of that time included students of I.K. Korobov-S.I. Chevakinsky and D.V. Ukhtomsky. The largest architect mid-18th century is F.B. Rastrelli. At the same time, many unknown serf architects, painters, sculptors, carvers and other masters of applied art were working with him.
   In the middle of the 18th century, the Baroque style in Russia had pronounced original features due to the continuity of decorative compositional techniques of Russian architecture of the early 18th century. One cannot help but emphasize the specific national feature of Baroque architecture in the mid-18th century - the polychromy of facades, the walls of which are painted blue, red, yellow and green. This is complemented by beams of columns, pilasters, and framed windows. A characteristic feature of architectural works is that groups of buildings or buildings often form a closed architectural ensemble, revealing itself only when one penetrates inside it. In palace and church premises, along with stucco picturesque decoration of walls and ceilings, multi-colored patterned floors were made from different types of wood. The ceiling painting creates the illusion of the infinity of the rising hall, which is emphasized by figures of different proportions floating in the sky, clearly separating their different distances from the viewer. The walls of the front rooms were framed with complex profiled gilded rods. The techniques for planning the halls are interesting. In palaces they are located according to the principle that the doors of passage halls are on a common axis, and their width illusorily increases.
   Imperial and estate palaces were created in unity with gardens and parks, which were characterized by a regular planning system with straight alleys, trimmed tree vegetation and ornamental flower beds. In this section, special mention should be made of the works of Rastrelli's chief architect Francesco Bartolomeo (1700-1771), whose work reached its apogee in 1740-1750. The main works include: the ensemble of the Smolny Monastery in St. Petersburg; palaces in Courland (Latvia), in Rundava and Mitava (Jelgava); palaces of the Elizabethan nobles M.I. Vorontsov and S.G. Stroganov in St. Petersburg; imperial palaces- Winter in the capital, Bolshoi (Catherine) in Tsarskoe Selo (Pushkin), Grand Palace in Peterhof, St. Andrew's Church and Mariinsky Palace in Kyiv. All of them characterize the Baroque style of the mid-18th century in Russia. The architect S.I. Chevakinsky worked simultaneously with F.B. Rastrelli. (1713-1770). The most remarkable creation of Chevakinsky S.I. surviving to this day was the design and construction of the huge two-story St. Nicholas Naval Cathedral (1753-1762) in St. Petersburg. Chevakinsky’s student was the future architect V.I. Bazhenov.
   The largest representative of the Moscow Baroque of the mid-18th century was the architect D.V. Ukhtomsky. (1719-1774). His work developed under the influence of the artistic views and works of F.B. Rastrelli, in particular in Moscow and the Moscow region: palaces in the Kremlin, Annegof and Perov. Only one work by Ukhtomsky has survived to this day - the five-tiered bell tower in the Trinity-Sergius Lavra in Zagorsk.

   III.) Prerequisites for the emergence and development of classicism.
   In the 1760s, a change in architectural and artistic style occurred in Russia. Decorative Baroque, which reached its apogee in the work of the greatest representative of this trend - the architect F.B. Rastrelli, gave way to classicism, which quickly established itself in St. Petersburg and Moscow, and then spread throughout the country. Classicism (from Latin - exemplary) is an artistic style that develops through the creative borrowing of forms, compositions and examples of art from the ancient world and the Italian Renaissance.
   The architecture of classicism is characterized by geometrically correct plans, logic and balance of symmetrical compositions, strict harmony of proportions and the widespread use of the order tectonic system. The decorative style of the Baroque ceased to correspond to the economic capabilities of the circle of customers, which was increasingly expanding to include small landed nobles and merchants. It also ceased to respond to changing aesthetic views.
   The development of architecture is determined by economic and social factors. The country's economy led to the formation of an extensive domestic market and increased foreign trade, which contributed to the productivity of landowners' farms, crafts and industrial production. As a result, the need arose for the construction of government and privately owned structures, often of national importance. These included commercial buildings: guest courtyards, markets, fairgrounds, contract houses, shops, and various warehouse buildings. As well as unique public buildings - stock exchanges and banks.
   Many government administrative buildings began to be built in cities: governor's houses, hospitals, prison castles, barracks for military garrisons. Culture and education developed intensively, which necessitated the construction of many buildings, educational institutions, various academies, institutes - boarding houses for noble and middle-class children, theaters and libraries. Cities grew rapidly, primarily due to estate-type residential development. In the conditions of enormous construction taking place in cities and estates, increased construction needs, architectural techniques and busy forms of Baroque, exquisitely complex and magnificent, turned out to be unacceptable, since the decorativeness of this style required significant material costs and a large number of qualified craftsmen of various specialties. Based on the above, there was an urgent need to revise the fundamentals of architecture. Thus, deep domestic preconditions of a material and ideological nature determined the crisis of the Baroque style, its extinction and led in Russia to the search for economic and realistic architecture. Therefore, it was the classical architecture of antiquity, expedient, simple and clear and at the same time expressive, that served as a standard of beauty and became a kind of ideal, the basis of classicism emerging in Russia.

   IV.) Architecture of early classicism (1760-1780).
   To guide widespread urban planning activities, a commission on the stone construction of St. Petersburg and Moscow was established in December 1762. Created to regulate the development of both capitals, it soon began to manage all urban planning in the country. The commission functioned until 1796. During this period, it was successively led by prominent architects: A.V. Kvasov (1763-1772); I.E. Starov (1772-1774); I. Lem (1775-1796). In addition to regulating the planning of St. Petersburg and Moscow, the commission over 34 years created master plans for 24 cities (Arkhangelsk, Astrakhan, Tver, Nizhny Novgorod, Kazan, Novgorod, Yaroslavl, Kostroma, Tomsk, Pskov, Voronezh, Vitebsk and others). The main city-forming factors were considered to be water and land routes, established administrative and retail space, clear city boundaries. Streamlining urban planning based on a geometrically regular rectangular system. The construction of city streets and squares was regulated by height. The main streets and squares were to be lined with model houses, placed close to each other. This contributed to the unity of street organization. The architectural appearance of the houses was determined by several approved exemplary facade designs. They were distinguished by the simplicity of their architectural solutions; their planes were enlivened only by the figured repeating frames of the window openings.
   In Russian cities, residential buildings usually had one or two floors, only in St. Petersburg the number of floors rose to three or four. During this period, A.V. Kvasov developed a project for the improvement of the Fontanka River embankment. The formation of through passage embankments and bridgehead areas turned the Fontanka into an important arc-forming highway. For Moscow in 1775, a new master plan was drawn up, preserving the radial-ring structure and outlining a system of squares in a semi-ring covering the Kremlin and Kitay-Gorod. For consideration and approval of privately owned development projects in 1775-1778. a special Stone Order functioned. In the 1760s, features of classicism began to appear more and more noticeably in Russian architecture. The earliest manifestation of classicism was the project of the "Pleasure House" in Oranienbaum (now does not exist). Compiled by the architect A.F. Kokorin and the so-called Boat House of A.F. Vista (1761-1762) in the Peter and Paul Fortress.
   During this period, famous architects worked in Russia: Yu.M. Felten and K.M. Blank, the Italian A. Rinaldi, the Frenchman T.B. Wallen-Delamont. Considering this period in the chronological sequence of construction of buildings, it should be noted that classical forms and clear compositional techniques increasingly replaced excessive decorativeness. Here it is necessary to consider the main creations of architects that have survived to this day. Antonio Rinaldi (1710-1794) - Chinese Palace (1762-1768) in Oranienbaum. The interior of the palace testifies to the high artistic skill of the architect. The whimsical outlines of the palace were in harmony with the surrounding park composition, with an artificial reservoir and beautifully decorated vegetation. The environment of the ceremonial premises of the one-story palace is especially distinguished by its majestic beauty - Big hall, Oval Hall, Hall of Music. Chinese cabinet with elements of decoration, Glass bead cabinet. The Rolling Hill Pavilion (1762-1774) is a well-preserved three-story pavilion with colonnades of bypass galleries on the second and third floors. The pavilion in Lomonosov is the only surviving reminder of folk entertainment. Marble Palace(1768-1785) is one of the unique phenomena of St. Petersburg and Russia, thanks to the multi-colored cladding of the facades. The three-story building is located on the site between the Neva and the Field of Mars and has a U-shaped composition with wings forming a rather deep front courtyard. The palace in Gatchina (1766-1781) is three-story with a passage gallery, at the bottom the main building is complemented by pentagonal six-tiered view towers and arched two-story wings covering the front courtyard. After the transfer of the palace to Tsarevich Pavel (1783), it was rebuilt inside and supplemented with closed squares at the ends of the original composition by V.F. Brenna.
   The restrained plasticity of the facades is complemented by the nobility of the local stone - light gray Pudost limestone. The ceremonial interiors are located on the second floor, the most significant of which are the White Hall, the Antechamber, the marble dining room and others. The palace was destroyed during the years of fascist occupation. Now restored. In addition to those mentioned above, A. Rinaldi built several Orthodox churches, the peculiarity of which is the combination in one composition of a five-domed structure, newly established in the Baroque period, and a high multi-tiered bell tower. The artificial use of classical orders, their tiered arrangement on bell towers and the delicate layout of the facades testify to the stylistic reality of artistic images, which corresponds to early classicism. In addition to monumental buildings, A. Rinaldi created a number of memorial structures. These include the Oryol Gate (1777-1782); Chesme Column (171-1778) in Pushkin; Chesma obelisk in Gatchina (1755-1778). The establishment of the Academy of Arts in 1757 brought about new architects, both Russian and foreign. These include A.F. Kokorinov (1726-1772), who came from Moscow, and J.B. Vallin-Delamont (1729-1800), invited from France by I.I. Shuvalov. The creations of these architects include the palace of G.A. Demidov. A special feature of the Demidov Palace is the cast-iron external terrace and cast-iron stairs with arched diverging flights connecting the palace with the garden. The building of the Academy of Arts (1764-1788) on the Universitetskaya embankment of Vasilyevsky Island. The buildings clearly show the style of early classicism. This should include the main building of the Herzen Pedagogical Institute. Northern façade of the Small Hermitage; Construction of a large Gostiny Dvor, built on foundations laid along the contour of the entire block. A.F. Kokorinov and J.B. Vallin-Delamont created palace ensembles in Russia that reflected the architecture of Parisian mansions and hotels with a closed front courtyard. An example of this could be the palace of I.G. Chernyshev, which has not survived to this day. In the middle of the 19th century, in its place near the Blue Bridge, the Mariinsky Palace was erected by the architect A.I. Stackenschneider. During the same period, the architect Yu.M. Felton launched a large construction activity. His work was formed under the influence of F.B. Rastrelli, and then he began to create within the framework of early classicism. The most significant creations of Felten are: the building of the Great Hermitage, the Alexander Institute, located next to the ensemble of the Smolny Monastery. The institute building with three courtyards has well preserved its original appearance, consistent with early classicism. The most perfect work of Yu.M. Felten is a fence Summer Garden from the side of the Neva embankment (1770-1784). It was created with the creative participation of P.E. Egorov (1731-1789); the iron links were forged by Tula blacksmiths, and the granite pillars with figured vases and the granite base were made by Putilov stonemasons. The fence is distinguished by simplicity, amazing proportionality and harmony of parts and the whole. The turn of Russian architecture towards classicism in Moscow was most clearly manifested in the huge ensemble of the Orphanage, erected in (1764-1770), not far from the Kremlin on the banks of the Moscow River according to the plans of the architect K.I. Blank (1728-1793). In the Kuskovo estate near Moscow, K.I. Blank erected the impressive Hermitage pavilion in 1860. In accordance with the emergence and development of classicism, the regular French system of gardening art was replaced by the landscape (English system), which spread to Western Europe and above all in England.

   V.) Architecture of strict classicism (1780-1800)
   The last quarter of the eighteenth century was marked by major socio-historical events (Crimea and north coast Black Sea). The state's economy developed rapidly. An all-Russian market, fairs and shopping centers were formed. The metallurgical industry developed significantly. Trade with Central Asia and China. The revitalization of economic life contributed to the quantitative and qualitative growth of cities and landowners' estates. All these phenomena are noticeably reflected in urban planning and architecture. The architecture of the Russian province was characterized by two features: most cities received new general plans. The architecture of cities, especially urban centers, was formed on the basis of techniques of strict classicism. Along with the types of buildings previously known, new structures began to be built in cities. In cities that still retained traces of defensive structures, they increasingly disappeared as a result of the implementation of new plans, and these cities acquired urban planning features characteristic of most Russian cities. Estate construction expanded, especially in the south of Russia and the Volga region. At the same time, a system was developed for the placement of various outbuildings depending on natural conditions . In the provincial estates of noble owners, manor houses were stone buildings of the palace type. The ceremonial architecture of classicism with porticoes became the personification of social and economic prestige. During the period under review, outstanding Russian architects created architectural creations that are the property of not only Russia, but the whole world. Some of them, namely: Vasily Ivanovich Bazhenov (1737-1799) - construction of the Grand Kremlin Palace and college buildings on the territory of the Moscow Kremlin. Despite the fact that the outstanding plan was realized, its significance for the fate of Russian architecture was not great, first of all, for the final establishment of classicism as the main stylistic direction in the development of Russian architecture. Creation of a country royal palace and park residence in the village of Tsaritsyno near Moscow. All buildings of the ensemble are located on rough terrain, parts of which are connected by two figured bridges, resulting in a single, unusually beautiful panorama that has no analogues in the history of architecture. Pashkov House (1784-1786), now the old building of the V.I. Lenin Library. Consisting of three different parts, the silhouette composition of the house crowning a green hillock is still one of the most perfect works of all Russian classicism of the late 18th century. The culmination of Bazhenov’s creativity was the project of the Mikhailovsky Castle in St. Petersburg (1797-1800). The castle was built without the participation of an architect; the managing builder was V.F. Brenna, who made significant changes to the interpretation of the main facade. Kazakov M.F.: Petrovsky Palace - he gave the appearance of the palace a pronounced national character, the ensemble of the Petrovsky Palace is an outstanding example of a harmonious architectural synthesis of classical principles and Russian national painting. The Senate building in the Moscow Kremlin - the Senate rotunda is recognized in the architecture of Russian classicism as the best ceremonial round hall and is the first example of a composition of this type in Russia. This hall is an important link in the development of Russian classicism. Church of Philip Metropolitan (1777-1788). A classic Russian composition was used in relation to an Orthodox church. In the second half of the 18th century, the rotunda began to be embodied in the architecture of Russian classicism when creating religious buildings; it was also used in the construction of the Baryshnikov mausoleum near Smolensk (1784-1802). Golitsyn Hospital (now the first city hospital of Pirogov). University building (1786-1793). The University building was damaged in 1812 and was rebuilt with changes in 1817-1819.
   The approval of the new general plan for Moscow in 1775 stimulated privately owned residential development, which developed widely in 1780-1800. By this time, two space-planning types of urban estates had finally been developed - the first main residential building and outbuildings located along the red line of the street, forming a three-part system that forms the development front; the second is a residential estate with an open front courtyard surrounded by wings and outbuildings. Since the 1770s, the development of classicism based on the ancient Roman principles of the Renaissance has been clearly visible in St. Petersburg construction. Some of them, namely: architect Starov I.E. (1745-1808) erects the Tauride Palace (1883-1789) with a landscape garden; Trinity Cathedral (1778-1790) in the Alexander Nevsky Lavra. The construction of the cathedral had an important ideological and patriotic significance, since under the arches of the temple there is the tomb of Alexander Nevsky. In addition to the greatest buildings mentioned above, Starov was engaged in design for the southern provinces, developed plans for the new cities of Nikolaev and Yekaterinoslavl; in the latter, the architect built the palace of the governor of the region - G.A. Potemkin.
   Architect Volkov F.I. (1755-1803). By 1790, he developed exemplary designs for barracks buildings, subordinating their appearance to the principles of classicism. The largest works are the building of the Naval Cadet Corps (1796-1798) on the Neva embankment. Ensemble of the General Post Office (1782-1789).
   Architect Quarenghi and Giacomo (1744-1817). Quarenghi's creations clearly embody the features of strict classicism. Some of them: the dacha of A.A. Bezborodko (1783-1788). The building of the Academy of Sciences (1783-1789), the Hermitage Theater (1783-1787), the building of the Assignation Bank (1783-1790), the Alexander Palace (1792-1796) in Tsarskoye Selo, the Arc de Triomphe in 1814 - Narva Gate.
   Important landscaping work continued in St. Petersburg. Granite embankments of the Neva, small rivers and channels were created. Remarkable architectural monuments were erected, which became important city-forming elements. On the banks of the Neva, before the unfinished construction of St. Isaac's Cathedral, one of the best equestrian elements in Europe was unveiled in 1782 - a monument to Peter I (sculptor E.M. Falcone and M.A. Collo; the snake was made by sculptor F.G. Gordeev). A wonderful bronze hollow sculptural composition on a natural granite rock. The size of the rock (10.1 meters high, 14.5 meters long, 5.5 meters wide) corresponded to a spacious coastal area. Another monument to Peter I was installed in the ensemble of the Mikhailovsky Castle (1800). A bronze equestrian statue was used (sculptor K.B. Rastreli - father, architect F.I. Volkov, bas-reliefs - sculptors V.I. Demont-Malinovsky, I.I. Terebinov, I. Moiseev under the direction of M.I. Kozlovsky) . In 1799, a 14-meter obelisk “Rumyantsev” was erected on Tsaritsyn Meadow (Field of Mars) (architect V.F. Brenna); in 1818 it was moved to Vasilyevsky Island to the First Cadet Corps, where the outstanding military leader P.A. Rumyantsev studied. In 1801, on Tsaritsyn Meadow there was
   A monument to the great Russian commander A.V. Suvorov was opened (sculptor M.I. Kozlovsky, moved closer to the bank of the Neva.

   3.) Conclusion.
   The most important progressive traditions of Russian architecture, which are of great importance for the practice of late architecture, are ensemble and urban planning art. If the desire to form architectural ensembles initially was of an intuitive nature, then later it became conscious.
   Architecture was transformed over time, but nevertheless, some features of Russian architecture existed and developed over the centuries, maintaining traditional stability until the 20th century, when the cosmopolitan essence of imperialism began to gradually erase them.

   4.) List of used literature .

   Arkin D.E. Russian architectural treatise-code of the 18th century. Architectural expedition position. - In the book: Architectural archive. M., 1946.

   Belekhov N.N., Petrov A.N. Ivan Starov. M., 1950.

   Pilyavsky V.I. History of Russian architecture. L., 1984.

   In the seventeenth century, the seven-hundred-year period of great ancient Russian stone construction ended. Subsequently, it will fit into more than one fascinating page in the chronicle of world architecture. And already Russian architecture of the 18th century will become famous for a number of innovations in art and construction. These changes were mainly due to the weighty demands of the government. First of all, the architecture of the 18th century in Russia had to express all the power, strength and grandeur of a huge empire in the form of architectural structures.

   With political and economic development Russia is also facing new requirements for urban planning. Conventionally, all Russian architecture of the 18th century can be represented mainly by several architectural trends. This is primarily Baroque and Rococo, and, of course, classicism.

   

   Russian architecture of the 18th century: main styles

   According to the definition " baroque"is a unique direction in painting and art, the distinctive features of which are extraordinary splendor, a peculiar contrast, as well as a special combination of the real and the illusory. Recognized masters of the 18th century in the Baroque style were considered Trezzini, Schlüter, Michetti, Zemtsov, Rastrelli, Chevansky and Ukhtomsky. It was in their works that the architecture of the 18th century in Russia was most clearly expressed; their names will forever remain in the history of the great power.

   The most significant contribution to the treasury of world and Russian architecture was the renovation of St. Petersburg. Among the variety of architectural structures of that time, the most impressive were: the Winter Palace, the Stroganov Palace, as well as the Smolny Monastery and Tsarskoye Selo. Petersburg could safely be called cultural capital that time. After all, it’s there Russian architecture of the 18th century was large-scale. Unlike Moscow and all other cities of Russia, the construction of religious buildings was practically not carried out in St. Petersburg - they were erected only in cases of extreme necessity.

   Architecture in Russia of the 18th century, in particular in the second half, begins to transform significantly. Decorative baroque and prim rococo were replaced by the architectural and artistic style - classicism. It quickly established itself not only in St. Petersburg and Moscow, but also spread throughout the country.

   Classicism in Russia

   Classicism(in translation from Latin - exemplary) - an artistic style created by a laconic combination of forms, samples and compositions of the art of the ancient world and a masterpiece of the Italian Renaissance.

   The architecture of the 18th century in Russia was also formed in the capable hands of such famous founders of Russian classicism as: V. I. Bazhenov, A. F. Kokorinov, M. F. Kazakov, I. E. Starov. Talented architects erected beautiful monuments that contained both classical architectural principles and elements of world classics, and also clearly traced the traditions of Russian architectural heritage. Architectural structures These architects are distinguished by their characteristic simplicity and rigor, as well as rationality.

   

   18th century architecture in Russia became famous for the following creations of the architecture of early Russian classicism: St. Petersburg Academy of Arts, works by V. I. Bazhenov in Moscow - Pashkov's built house and the unrealized project of the majestic Kremlin Palace in Tsaritsyn; Golitsyn Hospital, Moscow Senate in the Kremlin, and Tauride Palace in St. Petersburg I. E. Starova and others.

   The progressive traditions of Russian architecture of the 18th century were of great importance for the practice of later architecture. Every year the architecture was transformed, but some features of Russian architecture developed over the coming centuries, maintaining traditions and sustainability until the 20th century.

   

   I.M.Schmidt

   The eighteenth century was a time of remarkable flowering of Russian architecture. Continuing; on the one hand, their national traditions During this period, Russian masters began to actively master the experience of contemporary Western European architecture, reworking its principles in relation to the specific historical needs and conditions of their country. They have greatly enriched world architecture, introducing unique features into its development.

   For Russian architecture of the 18th century. Characterized by the decisive predominance of secular architecture over religious architecture, the breadth of urban plans and solutions. Was erected new capital- St. Petersburg, as the state strengthened, old cities expanded and were rebuilt.

   The decrees of Peter I contained specific orders relating to architecture and construction. Thus, his special order prescribed that the facades of newly constructed buildings should be placed on the red line of the streets, while in ancient Russian cities houses were often located in the depths of courtyards, behind various outbuildings.

   According to a number of its stylistic features, Russian architecture of the first half of the 18th century. can undoubtedly be compared with the Baroque style dominant in Europe.

   Nevertheless, a direct analogy cannot be drawn here. Russian architecture - especially from the time of Peter the Great - had a much greater simplicity of form than was characteristic of the late Baroque style in the West. In its ideological content, it affirmed the patriotic ideas of the greatness of the Russian state.

   One of the most remarkable buildings of the early 18th century is the Arsenal building in the Moscow Kremlin (1702-1736; architects Dmitry Ivanov, Mikhail Choglokov and Christoph Conrad). The large length of the building, the calm surface of the walls with sparsely spaced windows and the solemn and monumental design of the main gate clearly indicate a new direction in architecture. A completely unique solution is the small paired Arsenal windows, which have a semi-circular finish and huge external slopes like deep niches.

   New trends also penetrated into religious architecture. A striking example of this is the Church of the Archangel Gabriel, better known as the Menshikov Tower. It was built in 1704-1707. in Moscow, on the territory of the estate of A. D. Menshikov near Chistye Prudy, by the architect Ivan Petrovich Zarudny (died in 1727). Before the fire of 1723 (caused by a lightning strike), the Menshikov Tower - like the bell tower of the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg, which was built shortly after - was crowned with a high wooden spire, at the end of which was a gilded copper figure of the archangel. The height of this church exceeded the bell tower of Ivan the Great in the Kremlin ( The light, elongated dome of this church that now exists with a unique shape was made already at the beginning of the 19th century. The restoration of the church dates back to 1780.).

   I.P. 3arudny. Church of the Archangel Gabriel (“Menshikov Tower”) in Moscow. 1704-1707 View from the southwest.

   The Menshikov Tower is characteristic of Russian church architecture of the late 17th century. a composition of several tiers - “octagons” on a “quadruple”. At the same time, compared to the 17th century. here new trends are clearly outlined and new architectural techniques are used. Particularly bold and innovative was the use of a high spire in a church building, which was then so successfully used by St. Petersburg architects. Zarudny's appeal to the classical methods of the order system is characteristic. In particular, columns with Corinthian capitals, unusual for ancient Russian architecture, were introduced with great artistic tact. And quite boldly - powerful volutes flanking the main entrance to the temple and giving it a special monumentality, originality and solemnity.

   Zarudny also created wooden triumphal gates in Moscow - in honor of the Poltava victory (1709) and the conclusion of the Nystadt Peace (1721). Since the time of Peter the Great, the erection of triumphal arches has become a frequent phenomenon in the history of Russian architecture. Both wooden and permanent (stone) triumphal gates were usually richly decorated with sculpture. These buildings were monuments to the military glory of the Russian people and largely contributed to the decorative design of the city.

   
   Plan of the central part of St. Petersburg in the 18th century.

   With the greatest clarity and completeness, the new qualities of Russian architecture of the 18th century. manifested themselves in the architecture of St. Petersburg. The new Russian capital was founded in 1703 and was built unusually quickly.

   From an architectural point of view, St. Petersburg is of particular interest. It is the only capital city in Europe that emerged entirely in the 18th century. Its appearance vividly reflected not only the unique directions, styles and individual talents of the architects of the 18th century, but also the progressive principles of urban planning of that time, in particular planning. In addition to the brilliantly designed “three-beam” layout of the center of St. Petersburg, high urban planning art was manifested in the creation of complete ensembles and in the magnificent development of the embankments. From the very beginning, the indissoluble architectural and artistic unity of the city and its waterways represented one of the most important advantages and unique beauty of St. Petersburg. The formation of the architectural appearance of St. Petersburg in the first half of the 18th century. associated mainly with the activities of architects D. Trezzini, M. Zemtsov, I. Korobov and P. Eropkin.

   Domenico Trezzini (c. 1670-1734) was one of those foreign architects who, having arrived in Russia at the invitation of Peter I, remained here for many years, or even until the end of their lives. The name Trezzini is associated with many buildings of early St. Petersburg; he owns “exemplary”, that is, standard designs of residential buildings, palaces, temples, and various civil structures.

   
   Domenico Trezzini. Peter and Paul Cathedral in Leningrad. 1712-1733 View from the northwest.

   Trezzini did not work alone. A group of Russian architects worked with him, whose role in the creation of a number of buildings was extremely responsible. Trezzini's best and most significant creation is the famous Peter and Paul Cathedral, built in 1712-1733. The construction is based on the plan of a three-nave basilica. The most remarkable part of the cathedral is its upward-facing bell tower. Just like Zarudny's Menshikov Tower in its original form, the bell tower of the Peter and Paul Cathedral is crowned with a high spire, topped with the figure of an angel. The proud, easy rise of the spire is prepared by all the proportions and architectural forms of the bell tower; a gradual transition from the bell tower itself to the “needle” of the cathedral was thought out. The bell tower of the Peter and Paul Cathedral was conceived and implemented as an architectural dominant in the ensemble of St. Petersburg under construction, as the personification of the greatness of the Russian state, which established its new capital on the shores of the Gulf of Finland.

   
   Trezzini. The building of the Twelve Collegiums in Leningrad. Fragment of the facade.

   In 1722-1733 Another well-known Trezzini building is being created - the building of the Twelve Colleges. Strongly elongated in length, the building has twelve sections, each of which is designed as a relatively small but independent house with its own ceiling, pediment and entrance. Trezzini’s favorite strict pilasters in this case are used to unite the two upper floors of the building and emphasize the measured, calm rhythm of the divisions of the facade. The proud, rapid rise of the bell tower of the Peter and Paul Fortress Cathedral and the calm length of the building of the Twelve Colleges - these beautiful architectural contrasts were realized by Trezzini with the impeccable tact of an outstanding master.

   Most of Trezzini's works are characterized by restraint and even severity in architectural solution buildings. This is especially noticeable next to the decorative pomp and rich design of buildings of the mid-18th century.

   
   Georg Mattarnovi, Gaetano Chiaveri, M. G. Zemtsov. Kunstkamera in Leningrad. 1718-1734 Facade.

   The activities of Mikhail Grigorievich Zemtsov (1686-1743), who initially worked for Trezzini and attracted the attention of Peter I with his talent, were varied. Zemtsov participated, apparently, in all of Trezzini’s major works. He completed the construction of the Kunstkamera building, begun by the architects Georg Johann Mattarnovi and Gaetano Chiaveri, built the churches of Simeon and Anna, Isaac of Dalmatia and a number of other buildings in St. Petersburg.

   
   G. Mattarnovi, G. Chiaveri, M.G.3emtsov. Kunstkamera in Leningrad. Facade.

   Peter I attached great importance to the regular development of the city. The famous French architect Jean Baptiste Leblond was invited to Russia to develop a master plan for St. Petersburg. However, the master plan of St. Petersburg drawn up by Leblon had a number of very significant shortcomings. The architect did not take into account the natural development of the city, and his plan suffered largely from abstraction. Leblon's project was only partially implemented in the layout of the streets of Vasilievsky Island. Russian architects made many significant adjustments to its layout of St. Petersburg.

   A prominent urban planner of the early 18th century was the architect Pyotr Mikhailovich Eropkin (c. 1698-1740), who gave a remarkable solution to the three-ray layout of the Admiralty part of St. Petersburg (including Nevsky Prospekt). Carrying out a lot of work in the “Commission on St. Petersburg Construction” formed in 1737, Eropkin was in charge of the development of other areas of the city. His work ended in the most tragic way. The architect was associated with the Volynsky group, which opposed Biron. Among other prominent members of this group, Eropkin was arrested and executed in 1740.

   Eropkin is known not only as a practicing architect, but also as a theorist. He translated the works of Palladio into Russian, and also began work on the scientific treatise “The Position of an Architectural Expedition.” The last work concerning the main issues of Russian architecture was not completed by him; after his execution, this work was completed by Zemtsov and I.K. Korobov (1700-1747), the creator of the first stone building of the Admiralty. Topped with a tall thin spire, echoing the spire of the Peter and Paul Cathedral, the Admiralty Tower, built by Korobov in 1732-1738, became one of the most important architectural landmarks of St. Petersburg.

   Definition of the architectural style of the first half of the 18th century. usually causes a lot of controversy among researchers of Russian art. Indeed, the style of the first decades of the 18th century. was complex and often very contradictory. The Western European Baroque style, somewhat modified and more restrained in form, participated in its formation; The influence of Dutch architecture also had an effect. To one degree or another, the influence of the traditions of ancient Russian architecture also made itself felt. A distinctive feature of many of the first buildings of St. Petersburg was the harsh utilitarianism and simplicity of architectural forms. The unique originality of Russian architecture in the first decades of the 18th century. lies, however, not in the complex and sometimes contradictory interweaving of architectural styles, but primarily in the urban planning scope, in the life-affirming power and grandeur of the structures erected during this most important period for the Russian nation.

   After the death of Peter I (1725), the extensive civil and industrial construction undertaken on his instructions faded into the background. Begins new period in the development of Russian architecture. The best forces of architects were now directed to palace construction, which assumed an extraordinary scale. From about the 1740s. A distinct Russian Baroque style is established.

   In the mid-18th century, the broad career of Bartholomew Varfolomeevich Rastrelli (1700-1771), the son of the famous sculptor K.-B. Rastrelli. The work of Rastrelli the son belongs entirely to Russian art. His work reflected the increased power of the Russian Empire, the wealth of the highest court circles, who were the main customers of the magnificent palaces created by Rastrelli and the team he led.

   
   Johann Braunstein. Hermitage Pavilion in Peterhof (Petrodvorets). 1721-1725

   Rastrelli's activities in rebuilding the palace and park ensemble of Peterhof were of great importance. The site for the palace and an extensive garden and park ensemble, which later received the name Peterhof (now Petrodvorets), was planned in 1704 by Peter I himself. In 1714-1717. Monplaisir and stone were built Peterhof Palace based on designs by Andreas Schlüter. Subsequently, several architects were involved in the work, including Jean Baptiste Leblond, the main author of the layout of the park and fountains of Peterhof, and I. Braunstein, builder of the Marly and Hermitage pavilions.

   From the very beginning, the Peterhof ensemble was conceived as one of the world's largest ensembles of garden structures, sculptures and fountains, rivaling Versailles. The design, magnificent in its integrity, united the Grand Cascade and the grandiose staircase descents framing it with the Large Grotto in the center and towering above the entire palace into one inextricable whole.

   Without touching in this case on the complex issue of authorship and history of construction, which was carried out after Leblon’s sudden death, it should be noted that the installation in 1735 was central in its compositional role and ideological concept sculptural group“Samson Tearing the Lion’s Jaw” (the authorship is not precisely established), which completed the first stage of the creation of the largest of the regular park ensembles of the 18th century.

   In the 1740s. The second stage of construction in Peterhof began, when a grandiose reconstruction of the Great Peterhof Palace was undertaken by the architect Rastrelli. While maintaining some restraint in the design of the old Peterhof Palace, characteristic of the style of Peter the Great's time, Rastrelli nevertheless significantly enhanced its decorative design in the Baroque style. This was especially evident in the design of the left wing with the church and the right wing (the so-called Corps under the coat of arms) that were newly added to the palace. The final of the main stages of the construction of Peterhof dates back to the end of the 18th - the very beginning of the 19th century, when the architect A. N. Voronikhin and a whole galaxy of outstanding masters of Russian sculpture, including Kozlovsky, Martos, Shubin, Shchedrin, Prokofiev, were involved in the work.

   In general, Rastrelli’s first projects, dating back to the 1730s, are largely still close to the style of Peter the Great’s time and do not amaze with that luxury

   and pomp, which are manifested in his most famous creations - the Great (Catherine) Palace in Tsarskoe Selo (now the city of Pushkin), the Winter Palace and the Smolny Monastery in St. Petersburg.

   
   V.V. Rastrelli. The Great (Catherine) Palace in Tsarskoe Selo (Pushkin). 1752-1756 View from the park.

   Having started to create the Catherine Palace (1752-1756), Rastrelli did not rebuild it entirely. In the composition of his grandiose building, he skillfully included the already existing palace buildings of the architects Kvasov and Chevakinsky. Rastrelli combined these relatively small buildings, interconnected by one-story galleries, into one majestic building of a new palace, the facade of which reached three hundred meters in length. Low one-story galleries were built on and thereby raised to the overall height of the horizontal divisions of the palace; the old side buildings were included in the new building as protruding projections.

   Both inside and outside, Rastrelli's Catherine Palace was distinguished by its exceptional richness of decorative design, inexhaustible imagination and variety of motifs. The roof of the palace was gilded, and sculptural (also gilded) figures and decorative compositions rose above the balustrade surrounding it. The façade was decorated with mighty figures of Atlanteans and intricate stucco moldings depicting garlands of flowers. The white color of the columns stood out clearly against the blue color of the walls of the building.

   The interior space of the Tsarskoye Selo Palace was designed by Rastrelli along the longitudinal axis. The numerous halls of the palace, intended for ceremonial receptions, formed a solemn, beautiful enfilade. The main color combination of interior decoration is gold and white. Abundant gold carvings, images of frolicking cupids, exquisite forms of cartouches and volutes - all this was reflected in the mirrors, and in the evenings, especially on the days of receptions and ceremonies, it was brightly lit by countless candles ( This palace of rare beauty was barbarically looted and set on fire by Nazi troops during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. Thanks to the efforts of the masters of Soviet art, the Great Tsarskoye Selo Palace has now been restored, as far as possible.).

   In 1754-1762 Rastrelli is building another large structure - the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg, which became the basis of the future ensemble of Palace Square.

   In contrast to the very elongated Tsarskoye Selo Palace, the Winter Palace is designed in the form of a huge closed rectangle. The main entrance to the palace was at that time in the spacious internal front courtyard.

   
   V.V. Rastrelli. Winter Palace in Leningrad. 1754-1762 View from Palace Square.

   
   V.V. Rastrelli. Winter Palace in Leningrad. Facade from Palace Square. Fragment.

   Considering the location Winter Palace Rastrelli designed the facades of the building differently. Thus, the façade facing south onto the subsequently formed Palace Square, designed with a strong plastic accentuation of the central part (where the main entrance to the courtyard is located). On the contrary, the facade of the Winter Palace, facing the Neva, is maintained in a calmer rhythm of volumes and colonnade, thanks to which the length of the building is better perceived.

   
   V.V. Rastrelli. Cathedral of the Smolny Monastery in Leningrad. Fragment of the western facade.

   
   V.V. Rastrelli. Cathedral of the Smolny Monastery in Leningrad. Started in 1748. View from the west.

   Rastrelli's activities were mainly aimed at creating palace buildings. But even in church architecture he left an extremely valuable work - the design of the ensemble of the Smolny Monastery in St. Petersburg. The construction of the Smolny Monastery, which began in 1748, lasted for many decades and was completed by the architect V. P. Stasov in the first third of the 19th century. In addition, such an important part of the entire ensemble as the nine-tiered bell tower of the cathedral was never realized. In the composition of the five-domed cathedral and a number of general principles The decisions of the ensemble of the Rastrelli monastery were directly based on the traditions of ancient Russian architecture. At the same time, we see here the characteristic features of the architecture of the mid-18th century: the splendor of architectural forms, the inexhaustible richness of decor.

   Among Rastrelli’s outstanding creations are the wonderful Stroganov Palace in St. Petersburg (1750-1754), St. Andrew’s Cathedral in Kyiv, the Resurrection Cathedral of the New Jerusalem Monastery near Moscow, rebuilt according to his design, the wooden two-story Annenhof Palace in Moscow, which has not survived to this day, and others.

   If Rastrelli's activities took place mainly in St. Petersburg, then another outstanding Russian architect, Korobov's student Dmitry Vasilyevich Ukhtomsky (1719-1775), lived and worked in Moscow. Two remarkable monuments of Russian architecture of the mid-18th century are associated with his name: the bell tower of the Trinity-Sergius Lavra (1740-1770) and the stone Red Gate in Moscow (1753-1757).

   By the nature of his work, Ukhtomsky is quite close to Rastrelli. Both the bell tower of the Lavra and the triumphal gates are rich in external design, monumental and festive. Ukhtomsky’s valuable quality is his desire to develop ensemble solutions. And although his most significant plans were not realized (the project of the ensemble of the Invalid and Hospital Houses in Moscow), the progressive trends in Ukhtomsky’s work were picked up and developed by his great students - Bazhenov and Kazakov.

   A prominent place in the architecture of this period was occupied by the work of Savva Ivanovich Chevakinsky (1713-1774/80). A student and successor of Korobov, Chevakinsky participated in the development and implementation of a number of architectural projects in St. Petersburg and Tsarskoe Selo. Chevakinsky's talent was especially fully manifested in the St. Nicholas Naval Cathedral he created (St. Petersburg, 1753 - 1762). The slender four-tiered bell tower of the cathedral is wonderfully designed, enchanting with its festive elegance and impeccable proportions.

   Second half of the 18th century. marks new stage in the history of architecture. Just like other types of art, Russian architecture testifies to the strengthening of the Russian state and the growth of culture, and reflects a new, more elevated idea of ​​​​man. The ideas of citizenship proclaimed by the Enlightenment, the ideas of an ideal noble state built on reasonable principles find a unique expression in the aesthetics of classicism of the 18th century, and are reflected in increasingly clear, classically restrained forms of architecture.

   Since the 18th century. and until the mid-19th century, Russian architecture occupied one of the leading places in world architecture. Moscow, St. Petersburg and a number of other Russian cities are enriched at this time with first-class ensembles.

   The formation of early Russian classicism in architecture is inextricably linked with the names of A. F. Kokorinov, Wallen Delamot, A. Rinaldi, Yu. M. Felten.

   Alexander Filippovich Kokorinov (1726-1772) was among the direct assistants of one of the most prominent Russian architects of the mid-18th century. Ukhtomsky. As shown latest research, the young Kokorinov built the palace ensemble in Petrovsky-Razumovsky (1752-1753), glorified by his contemporaries, which has survived to this day modified and rebuilt. From the point of view of architectural style, this ensemble was undoubtedly close to the magnificent palace buildings of the mid-18th century, erected by Rastrelli and Ukhtomsky. New, foreshadowing the style of Russian classicism, was, in particular, the use of the severe Doric order in the design of the entrance gates of Razumovsky's palace.

   
   Wallen Delamoth. Small Hermitage in Leningrad. 1764-1767

   Around 1760, Kokorinov began many years of joint work with Wallen Delamoth (1729-1800), who came to Russia. Originally from France, Delamote came from a family of famous architects, the Blondels. The name of Wallen Delamoth is associated with such significant buildings in St. Petersburg as the Great Gostiny Dvor (1761 - 1785), the plan of which was developed by Rastrelli, and the Small Hermitage (1764-1767). The Delamot building, known as New Holland, is a building of Admiralty warehouses, where the arch made of simple dark red brick with decorative use of white stone, spanning the canal, attracts special attention with a subtle harmony of architectural forms and solemn and majestic simplicity.

   
   Wallen Delamoth. The central part of the main facade of the Academy of Arts in Leningrad. 1764-1788

   
   A.F. Kokorinov and Wallen Delamoth. Academy of Arts in Leningrad. 1764-1767 View from the Neva.

   
   Wallen Delamoth. "New Holland" in Leningrad. 1770-1779 Arch.

   Wallen Delamoth participated in the creation of one of the most unique structures of the 18th century. - Academy of Arts in St. Petersburg (1764-1788). The austere, monumental building of the Academy, built on Vasilyevsky Island, acquired important significance in the city ensemble. The main façade facing the Neva is majestically and calmly designed. The general design of this building indicates the predominance of the style of early classicism over baroque elements.

   What is most striking is the plan of this structure, which was apparently mainly developed by Kokorinov. Behind the outwardly calm facades of the building, which occupies an entire city block, hides a complex internal system of educational, residential and utility rooms, stairs and corridors, courtyards and passages. Particularly noteworthy is the layout of the Academy's courtyards, which included one huge round courtyard in the center and four smaller courtyards, rectangular in plan, with two corners rounded in each.

   
   A. F. Kokorinov, Wallen Delamoth. Academy of Arts in Leningrad. Plan.

   A building close to the art of early classicism is the Marble Palace (1768-1785). Its author was the Yang architect Antonio Rinaldi (c. 1710-1794), who was invited to Russia. In Rinaldi's earlier buildings, the features of the late Baroque and Rococo style were clearly visible (the latter is especially noticeable in the refined decoration of the apartments of the Chinese Palace in Oranienbaum).

   Along with large palace and park ensembles In Russia, estate architecture is becoming more and more widely developed. Particularly active construction of estates began in the second half of the 18th century, when Peter III issued a decree exempting nobles from compulsory public service. The Russian nobles, who had dispersed to their ancestral and newly acquired estates, began to intensively build and improve their landscaping, inviting the most prominent architects for this, as well as making extensive use of the labor of talented serf architects. Estate construction reached its greatest prosperity at the end of the 18th - beginning of the 19th century.

   
   Lattice of the Summer Garden in Leningrad. 1773-1784 Attributed to Yu. M. Felten.

   The master of early classicism was Yuri Matveevich Felten (1730-1801), one of the creators of the remarkable Neva embankments associated with the implementation of urban planning work in the 1760-1770s. The construction of the lattice of the Summer Garden, in the design of which Felten participated, is also closely connected with the ensemble of Neva embankments. Among the buildings of Velten, the building of the Old Hermitage should be mentioned.

   
   Laundry Bridge over the Fontanka River in Leningrad. 1780s

   In the second half of the 18th century. one of the greatest Russian architects, Vasily Ivanovich Bazhenov (1738-1799), lived and worked. Bazhenov was born into the family of a sexton near Moscow, near Maloyaroslavets. At the age of fifteen, Bazhenov was part of a team of painters during the construction of one of the palaces, where he was noticed by the architect Ukhtomsky, who accepted the gifted young man into his “architectural team.” After the organization of the Academy of Arts in St. Petersburg, Bazhenov was sent there from Moscow, where he studied at the gymnasium at Moscow University. In 1760, Bazhenov traveled abroad as a pensioner of the Academy, to France and Italy. The outstanding natural talent of the young architect already in those years received high recognition. Twenty-eight-year-old Bazhenov came from abroad with the title of professor of the Roman Academy and the title of academician of the Florence and Bologna Academies.

   Bazhenov’s exceptional talent as an architect and his great creative scope were especially clearly manifested in the project of the Kremlin Palace in Moscow, on which he began working in 1767, actually planning the creation of a new Kremlin ensemble.

   
   V.I. Bazhenov. Plan of the Kremlin Palace in Moscow.

   According to Bazhenov’s project, the Kremlin was to become, in the full sense of the word, the new center of the ancient Russian capital, and moreover, it would be most directly connected with the city. Based on this project, Bazhenov even intended to tear down part of the Kremlin wall from the Moscow River and Red Square. Thus, the newly created ensemble of several squares in the Kremlin and, first of all, the new Kremlin Palace would no longer be separated from the city.

   The façade of Bazhenov’s Kremlin Palace was supposed to be facing the Moscow River, to which ceremonial staircase descents, decorated with monumental and decorative sculpture, led from above, from the Kremlin hill.

   The palace building was designed to have four floors, with the first two floors having service purposes, and the third and fourth floors housing the palace apartments themselves with large double-height halls.

   
   V.I. Bazhenov. Project of the Grand Kremlin Palace in Moscow. Incision.

   In the architectural design of the Kremlin Palace, new squares, as well as the most significant interior spaces, an exceptionally large role was given to colonnades (mainly of the Ionic and Corinthian orders). In particular, a whole system of colonnades surrounded the main square in the Kremlin designed by Bazhenov. The architect intended to surround this square, which had an oval shape, with buildings with strongly protruding basement parts, forming, as it were, stepped stands to accommodate people.

   
   V. I. Bazhenov. Model of the Kremlin Palace. Fragment of the main facade. 1769-1772 Moscow, Museum of Architecture.

   Extensive preparatory work began; in a specially built house, a wonderful (preserved to this day) model of the future structure was made; Bazhenov carefully developed and designed the interior decoration and decoration of the palace...

   The unsuspecting architect was in for a cruel blow: as it turned out later, Catherine II did not intend to complete this grandiose construction; she started it mainly with the aim of demonstrating the power and wealth of the state during the Russian-Turkish war. Already in 1775, construction stopped completely.

   In subsequent years, Bazhenov’s largest work was the design and construction of an ensemble in Tsaritsyn near Moscow, which was supposed to be the summer residence of Catherine II. The ensemble in Tsaritsyn is a country estate with an asymmetrical arrangement of buildings, executed in a distinctive style, sometimes called “Russian Gothic,” but to a certain extent based on the use of motifs from Russian architecture of the 17th century.

   It is in the traditions of ancient Russian architecture that Bazhenov combines the red brick walls of Tsaritsyn buildings with details made of white stone.

   The surviving Bazhenov buildings in Tsaritsyn - the Opera House, the Figured Gate, the bridge across the road - give only a partial idea of ​​the general plan. Not only was Bazhenov’s project not implemented, but even the palace he had almost completed was rejected by the visiting empress and, on her orders, demolished.

   
   V. I. Bazhenov. Pavilions of the Mikhailovsky (Engineering) Castle in Leningrad. 1797-1800

   
   V. I. Bazhenov. Mikhailovsky (Engineering) Castle in Leningrad. 1797-1800 Northern façade.

   Bazhenov paid tribute to the emerging pre-romantic tendencies in the project of the Mikhailovsky (Engineers) Castle, which, with some changes, was carried out by the architect V. F. Brenna. Built by order of Paul I in St. Petersburg, Mikhailovsky Castle (1797-1800) was at that time a structure surrounded, like a fortress, by ditches; drawbridges were thrown across them. The tectonic clarity of the general architectural design and at the same time the complexity of the layout were combined here in a unique way.

   In most of his projects and structures, Bazhenov acted as the greatest master of early Russian classicism. A remarkable creation of Bazhenov is the Pashkov House in Moscow (now the old building of the State Library named after V. I. Lenin). This building was built in 1784-1787. A palace-type structure, the Pashkov House (named after the first owner) turned out to be so perfect that both from the point of view of the urban ensemble and in terms of its high artistic merits, it took one of the first places among the monuments of Russian architecture.

   
   V. I. Bazhenov. House of P.E. Pashkov in Moscow. 1784-1787 Main facade.

   The main entrance to the building was located from the front yard, where several service buildings of the palace-estate were located. Situated on a hill rising from Mokhovaya Street, Pashkov’s house faces its main façade towards the Kremlin. The main architectural mass of the palace is its central three-story building, topped with a light belvedere. There are two side two-story buildings on both sides of the building. The central building of Pashkov's house is decorated with a Corinthian order colonnade, connecting the second and third floors. The side pavilions have smooth columns of the Ionic order. The subtle thoughtfulness of the overall composition and all the details gives this structure extraordinary lightness and at the same time significance and monumentality. The true harmony of the whole, the grace of the elaboration of details eloquently testify to the genius of its creator.

   Another great Russian architect who worked at one time with Bazhenov was Matvey Fedorovich Kazakov (1738-1812). A native of Moscow, Kazakov connected his creative activity even more closely than Bazhenov with Moscow architecture. Having entered the Ukhtomsky school at the age of thirteen, Kazakov learned the art of architecture in practice. He was neither at the Academy of Arts nor abroad. From the first half of the 1760s. young Kazakov was already working in Tver, where a number of buildings for both residential and public purposes were built according to his design.

   In 1767, Kazakov was invited by Bazhenov as his direct assistant to design the ensemble of the new Kremlin Palace.

   
   M.F.Kazakov.Senate in the Moscow Kremlin. Plan.

   
   M. F. Kazakov. Senate in the Moscow Kremlin. 1776-1787 Main facade.

   One of the earliest and at the same time most significant and famous buildings Kazakova - Senate building in Moscow (1776-1787). The Senate building (currently the Supreme Soviet of the USSR is located here) is located inside the Kremlin not far from the Arsenal. Triangular in plan (with courtyards), one of its facades faces Red Square. The central compositional unit of the building is the Senate hall, which has a huge domed ceiling for that time, the diameter of which reaches almost 25 m. The relatively modest design of the building from the outside is contrasted with the magnificent design of the round main hall, which has three tiers of windows, a Corinthian order colonnade, a coffered dome and a rich stucco.

   The next widely known creation of Kazakov is the building of Moscow University (1786-1793). This time, Kazakov turned to the common plan of a city estate in the form of the letter P. In the center of the building there is an assembly hall in the shape of a semi-rotunda with a domed ceiling. The original appearance of the university, built by Kazakov, differs significantly from the external design given to it by D.I. Gilardi, who restored the university after the fire of Moscow in 1812. The Doric colonnade, reliefs and pediment above the portico, aedicules at the ends of the side wings, etc. - all this was not in Kazakov’s building. It looked taller and less spread out along the façade. The main facade of the university in the 18th century. had a more slender and lighter colonnade of the portico (Ionic order), the walls of the building were divided by blades and panels, the ends of the side wings of the building had Ionic porticoes with four pilasters and a pediment.

   Like Bazhenov, Kazakov sometimes turned in his work to the architectural traditions of Ancient Rus', for example, in the Petrovsky Palace, built in 1775-1782. Jug-shaped columns, arches, window decorations, hanging weights, etc., together with red brick walls and white stone decorations, clearly echoed pre-Petrine architecture.

   However, most of Kazakov’s church buildings - the Church of Philip Metropolitan, the Church of the Ascension on Gorokhovskaya Street (now Kazakova Street) in Moscow, the church-mausoleum of Baryshnikov (in the village of Nikolo-Pogoreloye, Smolensk region) - were decided not so much in terms of ancient Russian churches, but in the spirit classically torus

   The 18th century is considered important and significant in Russian architecture and urban planning. It is characterized by three directions - Baroque, Rococo and Classicism, which appeared successively over the course of the century. During this period there appear newer than the city, objects are created that in our time are considered recognized historical and architectural monuments.

   First third of the 18th century. Baroque

   In the first third of the century, all architectural transformations were inextricably linked with the name of Peter the Great. During this period, Russian cities have undergone significant changes both in socio-economic terms and in architectural and planning terms. It was at this time that industry developed, which led to the construction of many industrial cities and towns. Political situation in the country and abroad created the preconditions for the dominant nobility and merchants during this period to be drawn into the construction of public facilities. If before this period, the most majestic and beautiful were created mainly by churches and royal residences (chambers), then at the beginning of the 18th century in cities great importance was paid to the appearance of ordinary residential buildings, as well as the emerging theaters, embankments, there was a massive construction of town halls, schools, hospitals (the so-called gospitals), homes for orphans. Since 1710, brick has been actively used in construction instead of wooden buildings. True, initially this innovation concerned, first of all, the capitals, while for the periphery stone and brick remained prohibited for a long time.

   Peter I creates a special commission, which in the future will become the main body of state planning for both the capital and other cities. Civil construction already prevails over church construction. Great importance is attached not only to facades, but also to the appearance of the entire city - houses are beginning to be built with facades along the streets, buildings are being deconsolidated for fire safety purposes, streets are being landscaped, roads are being paved, the issue of street lighting is being resolved, trees are being planted along the roadsides. In all this one can feel the visible influence of the West and the firm hand of Peter, who with his decrees practically brought about a revolution in urban planning in those years. Therefore, it is not surprising that Russia is for short term manages to practically catch up with Europe, reaching a decent level in terms of urban planning and urban improvement.

   The main architectural event of the beginning of the century is considered to be the construction of St. Petersburg. It is from this city and the Moscow Lefortovo Sloboda that serious transformations in architectural appearance other cities. Western-oriented Peter the Great invites foreign architects and sends Russian specialists to study in Europe.
   Trezzini, Leblon, Michetti, Schedel, Rastrelli (father) and other eminent architects who were destined to make a great contribution to Russian architecture in the first quarter of the 18th century came to Russia. What’s interesting is that if at the beginning of their creative career in Russia they clearly followed their principles and Western architectural thinking, then after a certain period of time, historians note the influence of our culture and identity, which can be seen in their later works.
   In the first third of the 18th century, the predominant direction in architecture and construction was Baroque. This direction is characterized by a combination of reality and illusion, splendor and contrast. The construction of St. Petersburg begins with the foundation of the Peter and Paul Fortress in 1703 and the Admiralty in 1704. Peter set serious tasks for the architects of that period in terms of compliance of the new city with advanced European principles of urban planning. Thanks to the coordinated work of Russian architects and their foreign colleagues, northern capital acquired formally Western features in merging with traditionally Russian ones. The style in which numerous pompous palaces, churches, government agencies, museums and theaters are now often called Russian Baroque or Baroque of the Peter the Great era.

   
   During this period, the Peter and Paul Cathedral, the summer palace of Peter the Great, the Kunstkamera, the Menshiikov Palace, and the building of the Twelve Colleges in St. Petersburg were created. The ensembles of the Winter Palace, Tsarskoe Selo, Peterhof, Smolny Monastery, and the Stroganov Palace are decorated in the Baroque style, created in this and later periods. In Moscow, these are the churches of the Archangel Gabriel and John the Warrior on Yakimanka; the main entrance to the Arsenal Courtyard of the Kremlin is decorated with characteristic elements characteristic of this period. Among the important objects of provincial cities, it is worth noting the Peter and Paul Cathedral in Kazan.

   Mid 18th century. Baroque and Rococo

   Despite the fact that the death of Peter I was a great loss for the state, it no longer had a significant impact on the development of urban planning and architecture of that period. Russian architects working in St. Petersburg under the supervision of foreigners adopted their experience, and those who were sent to study abroad also returned to their homeland. The country at that time had strong personnel. The leading Russian architects of that period were Eropkin, Usov, Korobov, Zemtsov, Michurin, Blank and others.
   The style characteristic of this period is called Rococo and is a combination of Baroque and emerging classicism. It shows gallantry and confidence. Rococo is more typical for interior solutions of that time. In the construction of buildings, the pomp and pomp of Baroque is still noted, and the strict and simple features of classicism begin to appear.
   This period, which coincided with the reign of Peter’s daughter Elizabeth, is marked by the work of Rastrelli the son. Brought up on Russian culture, in his works he demonstrated not only the brilliance and luxury of palace architecture, but also an understanding of the Russian character, Russian nature. His projects, together with the work of his contemporaries Kvasov, Chevakinsky, Ukhtomsky, organically fit into the history of Russian architecture of the 18th century. With the light hand of Rastrelli, domed compositions began to appear not only in the capital, but also in other Russian cities, gradually replacing the spire-shaped ones. The pomp and scale of his palace ensembles have no analogues in Russian history. But with all the recognition and luxury, the art of Rastrelli and his contemporaries did not last long, and in the second half of the 18th century it was replaced by a wave of classicism. During this period, the most large-scale projects were created - a new master plan for St. Petersburg and a redevelopment project for Moscow.

   Late 18th century. Classicism

   In Russian architecture in the last third of the 18th century, features of a new direction began to appear, which was later called Russian classicism. By the end of the century, classicism was firmly established as the main direction of art and architecture. This trend is characterized by the rigor of ancient forms, simplicity and rationality of designs. In contrast to the buildings in the Baroque style that filled St. Petersburg and its environs, classicism most manifested itself in Moscow buildings of that time. Among many, it is worth noting the Pashkov house, the Senate building, the Tsaritsyn complex, the Golitsyn house, the Razumovsky palace, which are considered the most striking examples of classicism in architecture. In St. Petersburg at that time the Tauride Palace, the Alexander Nevsky Lavra, the Marble Palace, the Hermitage, the Hermitage Theater, and the Academy of Sciences were being built. Kazakov, Bazhenov, Ukhtomsky and many others are rightfully considered outstanding architects of that time.
   The period of the 18th century also included changes that affected many provincial cities of that time - Yaroslavl, Kostroma, Nizhny Novgorod, Arkhangelsk, Odoev Bogoroditsk, Oranienbaum, now Lomonosov, Tsarskoe Selo, now Pushkin and so on. Petrozavodsk, Taganrog, Yekaterinburg and many other cities began in the 18th century and became important industrial and economic centers of the Russian state during that period and subsequently.

    

   It might be useful to read:

   • How to get on an excursion to Antarctica?;
   • Czech Republic Troy Castle. Troja Castle in Prague. Ancient winery and museum;
   • Böcklin and his “island of the dead” A cultural phenomenon of its time;
   • Air tickets to Crimea Air tickets to Crimea will become cheaper;
   • What you can and cannot take with you;
   • Open left menu Heviz How to get from Budapest to Lake Heviz;
   • Cable car in Nha Trang (Vinpearl) The longest cable car in the world Vietnam;
   • Kamenets-Podolsk fortress - a historical monument of Ukraine Life outside the walls of the Kamenets-Podolsk fortress;